How Did the Colonists React to the Townshend Act?

Colonists organized boycotts of British goods to pressure Parliament to repeal the Townshend Acts. As British customs officials arrived to collect taxes and prosecute smugglers, colonial opposition intensified, resulting in street demonstrations and protests that sometimes turned violent.

What happened as a result of the Townshend Acts?

The Townshend Acts were met with resistance in the colonies, which eventually resulted in the Boston Massacre of 1770. They placed an indirect tax on glass, lead, paints, paper, and tea, all of which had to be imported from Britain.

What was the cause and effect of the Townshend Act?

The Townshend Acts used all the money collected for imported goods to pay the salaries of British soldiers. Cause: Britain still needed money, but they needed a way to tax the colonies “without offense.” Effect: The colonists boycotted British goods again. Effect: Once again angered the colonists.

Why did colonists oppose the Townshend Act?

Money was going to pay for british royal governor salaries. How did the colonists show opposition in the Townshend Acts ? Colonists would be raising money for england. Colonists opposed this act because they were being restricted to land claims.

What was the colonists main argument against the Stamp Act?

Arguing that only their own representative assemblies could tax them, the colonists insisted that the act was unconstitutional, and they resorted to mob violence to intimidate stamp collectors into resigning.

What did the colonists boycott?

Many colonists felt that they should not pay these taxes, because they were passed in England by Parliament, not by their own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens. The colonists started to resist by boycotting, or not buying, British goods.

What did the colonists do about the Quartering Act?

It revived the anger that colonists had felt regarding the earlier Quartering Act (1765), which had been allowed to expire in 1770. The new Quartering Act, which Parliament passed on June 2, 1774, gave colonial governors the right to requisition unoccupied buildings to house British troops.

How did the Quartering Act violate citizens rights?

The Quartering Act of 1765 went way beyond what Thomas Gage had requested. Of course, the colonists disputed the legality of this Act because it seemed to violate the Bill of Rights of 1689, which forbid taxation without representation and the raising or keeping a standing army without the consent of Parliament.

Did the colonists support the Stamp Act?

The Stamp Act was very unpopular among colonists. A majority considered it a violation of their rights as Englishmen to be taxed without their consent—consent that only the colonial legislatures could grant. Their slogan was “No taxation without representation”.

What were the effects of the Quartering Act?

This new act allowed royal governors, rather than colonial legislatures, to find homes and buildings to quarter or house British soldiers. This only further enraged the colonists by having what appeared to be foreign soldiers boarded in American cities and taking away their authority to keep the soldiers distant.

Who did the Quartering Act effect?

The Quartering Act of 1765 required the colonies to house British soldiers in barracks provided by the colonies. If the barracks were too small to house all the soldiers, then localities were to accommodate the soldiers in local inns, livery stables, ale houses, victualling houses and the houses of sellers of wine.

Why did the Quartering Act end?

In the end, like the Stamp and Sugar acts, the Quartering Act was repealed, in 1770, when Parliament realized that the costs of enforcing it far outweighed the benefits. In 1774, a far more draconian Quartering Act was imposed on the colonists of Massachusetts as one of the punishments for the Boston Tea Party.

What was the cause and effect of the Declaratory Act?

Cause: The king needed money to pay off his war debt and no one was buying sugar. Effect: The colonists convinced them to repeal it, but the same day they passed the Declaratory Act. Cause: Britain needed money to pay off their war debt. Effect: Colonists were still upset about being taxed.

Why did the Declaratory Act upset the colonists?

The Declaratory Act was a reaction of British Parliament to the failure of the Stamp Act as they did not want to give up on the principle of imperial taxation asserting its legal right to tax colonies.

What are two things the Declaratory Act did?

Declaratory Act, (1766), declaration by the British Parliament that accompanied the repeal of the Stamp Act. It stated that the British Parliament’s taxing authority was the same in America as in Great Britain. Parliament had directly taxed the colonies for revenue in the Sugar Act (1764) and the Stamp Act (1765).

How did the colonists respond to the Declaratory Act?

To Parliament’s great surprise, outraged Americans responded angrily with legislative protests and street violence. Taken aback by colonial reaction, and succumbing to pressure from British merchants who were suffering financially from American boycotts, Parliament was forced to repeal the Stamp Act on March 18, 1766.

How did the colonists react to the Declaratory Act quizlet?

Colonists celebrated the repeal of the Stamp Act; they relaxed the boycott, but ignored the Declaratory Act. Colonists in New York Violently refused to comply.

What was the Sugar Act and why was it important?

Sugar Act, also called Plantation Act or Revenue Act, (1764), in U.S. colonial history, British legislation aimed at ending the smuggling trade in sugar and molasses from the French and Dutch West Indies and at providing increased revenues to fund enlarged British Empire responsibilities following the French and Indian …

Why was the Sugar Act bad?

The Sugar Act also increased enforcement of smuggling laws. Strict enforcement of the Sugar Act successfully reduced smuggling, but it greatly disrupted the economy of the American colonies by increasing the cost of many imported items, and reducing exports to non-British markets.

How did the Sugar Act lead to American Revolution?

By reducing the rate by half and increasing measures to enforce the tax, the British hoped that the tax would actually be collected. These incidents increased the colonists’ concerns about the intent of the British Parliament and helped the growing movement that became the American Revolution.

What did the Sugar Act require colonists to do?

Definition of Sugar Act The American Revenue Act of 1764, so called Sugar Act, was a law that attempted to curb the smuggling of sugar and molasses in the colonies by reducing the previous tax rate and enforcing the collection of duties.

How did the Sugar Act lead to the American Revolution quizlet?

Terms in this set (6) Tax on sugar, molasses, and most shipped goods. This made colonist angry because they now have to pay tax on sugar. This led to colonist fighting for their freedom. They ended up boycotting the British goods.

Why did tension rise in the 13 colonies?

Colonists resented the end of “salutary neglect,” the curtailment of self-government, and inability to set taxation policy (“no taxation without representation”). Colonial confrontations (e.g., Boston Massacre and Boston Tea Party) exacerbated tensions.

Was the sugar act good or bad?

Key Takeaways: Sugar Act of 1764 In the American colonies, the Sugar Act was especially harmful to merchants and consumers in the New England seaports.